Julie Cooper MP for Burnley and Padiham

Recent Activity

The last few weeks have been especially busy with the NHS featuring large in my life both in terms of my public role and my private life. I was contacted repeatedly over the festive period by the various national media raising concerns over a struggling NHS. Queues at A & E and growing waiting lists have now become a feature of everyday life in the UK but until recently we didn’t hear much about the problems in GP surgeries. Getting an appointment to see a GP is often difficult and patients regularly wait over a week and in some cases longer for an appointment. This is at the very least inconvenient but according  to Dr Helen Lampard-Stokes, the CEO of the Royal College of GPs this delay can also have serious implications for patient safety. She claims that because GP surgeries are struggling to cope with the demand for appointments some patients who require apparently none urgent appointments are sometimes kept waiting for more than 3 weeks. This means that investigations into potentially serious conditions including cancer are being delayed. It is unusual for us to hear the voice of the Royal College of GPs but this Christmas we did and this is a measure of the seriousness of the situation.  The Government must listen to the professionals. Demands on GPs have never been greater but funding for their services as a percentage of the total NHS budget has been reduced and it is a fact that 6 years’ worth of cuts to social care budgets has made the problems worse. Added to this the Government’s own minister predicted that funding cuts will lead to the closure of 3000 pharmacies nationwide. Closing community pharmacies will lead to more patients clamouring for a GP appointment.

Our healthcare professionals are at the sharp end but in spite of all the extra challenges they face, they remain extraordinarily dedicated and deserve our gratitude. I had time to reflect on this over the festive period as I sat in a hospital corridor waiting with my elderly mother. The queues for assessment, for treatment and for admission were long. Patients waited on trollies, resigned and all the while paramedics, nurses, doctors, porters etc. all worked flat out, many staying long past their scheduled finish time, all kind, efficient and professional. I know from previous experience, and I’m sure that many of you will also know, that none of this is unusual. This state of affairs is not acceptable. This is not about apportioning blame; it is about accepting in the first place that there is a problem. I know from my work in Parliament during the last two years on the Health Select Committee, visiting medical facilities the length and breadth of the UK and most recently within the Shadow Health Team that the NHS is desperately short of funding and in fact the percentage of GDP per person spent on the NHS in Britain is one of the lowest in Europe. This should tell us something but the crisis is not just one of funding, though the extra £350 million per week promised during the Referendum would be really useful. The second challenge facing the NHS is the fact that the whole service is understaffed and recruitment of qualified health professionals in every department is very difficult. Thirdly the NHS needs to adapt its processes and systems to meet the needs of Britain in the 21st Century. The complex needs of an aging population together with the rapid advances in medical technology mean that the system introduced by the Labour Government in 1948 is no longer fit for purpose in its current form. This is accepted by people from all political parties but the Government still seems to be in denial and is unwilling to provide the necessary funding for transformational improvements to develop a comprehensive National Health and Social Care Service. Investing in the NHS now would not only greatly improve the patient experience but would lead to long term financial savings.  The Government’s failure to act is causing unnecessary suffering for millions of people across the country.  The elderly, the chronically ill and the mentally ill are bearing the brunt of a `sticking plaster approach` that is little more than crisis management.  Surely this situation is unacceptable to all.




An NHS in Crisis

The last few weeks have been especially busy with the NHS featuring large in my life both in terms of my public role and my private life. I was contacted...


This week I participated in a Westminster Hall debate on community pharmacies. I once again raised the Oppositions deep concerns about the long term impact of the Government’s cuts to the pharmacy budget, which will inevitably lead to a greater stain on A & E and GPs. In my speech I discussed the following:

“It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Bailey. I thank Mrs Main for securing this debate on a very important subject. It is pleasing to hear so much agreement around the room; I hope that the Minister is listening. I agree with most of what hon. Members have said.

This subject is very dear to my heart. My husband is a community pharmacist, and I worked with him for 24 years in our own community pharmacy in my constituency of Burnley; I have to add that we no longer have any financial interest in community pharmacy, but what I retain is a very deep understanding of the value of community pharmacy to patients, the community and the wider NHS, so I appreciate the hon. Member for St Albans securing this important debate.

I cannot think of a better way to demonstrate the value of community pharmacies than to talk about my experience. Coopers chemist in Burnley—a deprived constituency in many ways, where life expectancy is closer to 80 than 90—serves a community along with four other pharmacies in very close proximity, all of which are really busy and serve a big demand. On a typical day, we dealt with 600 prescriptions and 100 minor ailments, and ran many other services—forgive me if I forget some, because there were so many—including medication use reviews designed to maximise our use of medication, make sure patients understood it, encourage compliance and save money on wastage; smoking cessation programmes; dietary advice; emergency hormonal contraception; methadone programmes; and support for diabetics and asthmatics. It was an ever-increasing list. Those are the kinds of services that are at risk if the Government pursue their plans.

I appreciate the value of community pharmacies. I am also a former private business owner. Let us not forget that that is what community pharmacies are; they are not provided for and paid for by the NHS.

To return to value for money, it is important that the Government take a responsible attitude and review funding for pharmacies, and I think that professional community pharmacists across the country accept that. Much has been made of the clusters. Pharmacies are independent businesses that arise and stay in business where there is demand. I do not know whether this is widely understood—hon. Members will have to forgive me if they already know this—but the global sum allocated to pharmacies is what pharmacies cost the Government. The Government know what community pharmacies are going to cost. If a new one opens, it does not cost the Government any more; it just means that the same amount of money is shared out more thinly. That is a bit of a red herring. We can be sure that if there is not demand for the services that a pharmacy provides, it will close.

Much has been made of the £25,000 payment, but that does not cover the cost of putting a van on the road and paying for a driver to deliver and administer a prescription delivery service. Those services are absolutely invaluable to communities with many elderly people. I had a conversation with practice managers and general practitioners in my constituency recently, and they were absolutely horrified because they use that service—there is a lot of repeat ordering—and if it were lost, they could not cope.

The Government are suggesting that in-surgery pharmacists are a substitute, but that is another red herring. I welcome the use of well qualified pharmacists in GP surgeries, but that is a totally separate issue. It is like comparing hospital doctors to GPs. Community pharmacists are at the heart of the community and are accessible for many hours. Steve Double made the point very well earlier when he said that eight minutes is the average wait to see a qualified professional who can help with most things. We have got to embrace that and use what is already there.

I have had conversations with the National Pharmacy Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and just last night the chair of the English Pharmacy Board said, “We want to work with the Government. We want to sit down and look at how we can do more.” There is the idea that integration is a new thing waiting to happen, but we were proud as community pharmacists to be at the heart of the primary care team, working with GP surgeries, hospital discharge teams, community nurses and district nurses. They often came to us. GPs came and went—that is even more the case now, given the problems with retention in GP practices—so we provided the only continuity in healthcare for many chronically ill people. Particularly for the elderly, that was a vital part of the service, and we were really proud to provide it.

Many community pharmacies are proactive. When this business of moving towards a clinical approach was suggested, community pharmacies accepted it without it needing to be mandated. We invested in a purpose-built consulting room to provide a more clinical environment. That is the way forward, and most community pharmacies accept that.

What is the alternative to what the Government are proposing? For a start, we need a proper assessment of what the cuts will mean. There has been no impact assessment of which pharmacies will close. I agree with Jo Churchill that it will not be the multiples that will close; it will be the independent pharmacies that rely on the £25,000 to provide their core services. That is an absolute fact. Not a single pharmacy in my constituency qualifies for access payments, and only three in the entire city of London do. I can say with absolute confidence that in my constituency it will not be Boots that closes or cuts its hours; because of the volume of business, it has other ways of covering its overheads.

I ask the Government not to throw money willy-nilly at pharmacies, but to look at their value and assess the impact of the cuts. If they think that the best way forward is for some pharmacies to close, they must ensure that the right ones close. We must do what the professional organisations are asking for and come to the table. Pharmacies are begging to take on extended roles. There is so much good will there. The minor ailment scheme, which we were privileged to provide, is an important service. Busy families who have children with minor ailments do not have time to be at the GP surgery. GPs accept that, without that service, they could not manage. We all know that GPs work hard and are overstretched. This is not about criticising the work they do; it is about supporting them, saving the NHS money and taking off pressure.

I ask the Minister not to reconsider the funding, but to look at the way he works with pharmacies in the NHS. I ask him to look at their role, as many Conservative Members have said, and at how they can work with the Government to support other areas of the NHS, thereby saving money. Let us avoid a knee-jerk reaction with no proper assessment of the impact. Let us deliver a better integrated service. The way to do that is not to make blind cuts with no proper assessment.”

You can see the video of my speech at ( copy and paste the link): http://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/521e96b7-560b-421f-acc9-60067a627d30?in=10:28:44&out=10:39:03

Julie Calls on the Government to Reconsider Pharmacy Cuts


I would like to take this opportunity to wish you all a very merry Christmas and a peaceful new year.

Christmas means different things to different people. For me Christmas is a time for faith and for fellowship; a time for family; a time of togetherness and goodwill to all. For some people who don’t celebrate, Christmas represents only a welcome break from work, for others Christmas means extra work: longer hours for retail workers and for restaurant staff. And of course for some who work in our vital public services it will be business as usual. It is important that we appreciate all those who will be working in the health service, the police and fire services this Christmas. Our thoughts should also turn to those in our armed forces who won’t be home for Christmas.

In this last week I have been pleased to attend yuletide services across the constituency. They have all been different in form but the messages of light and peace and hope have been evident in all. I would also like to publicly record my thanks once again to all the children who took part in my Christmas card competition and to personally congratulate the winner, Olivia Harker.

It has been a busy year. On the national and international scene we have seen the appointment of a new British Prime Minister, an EU referendum, a US presidential election and more division across the world between the nations and peoples than any of us would want to see in a lifetime. In these chaotic and troubled times I always try to stay focused and involve myself in the issues that you tell me matter to you most. In parliament I make sure that your voice is heard and at home I work hard with my staff to provide personal assistance and this year I am pleased to report that we helped close to 6000 people with their individual problems.  I am proud to be your MP and in 2017 I commit to working even harder on your behalf.



Merry Christmas

View More Activities

The Labour Party will place cookies on your computer to help us make this website better.

Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site.

To find out more about these cookies, see our privacy notice. Use of this site confirms your acceptance of these cookies.